close menu

Case studies

It is essential to have an up-to-date and clearly set out will to so that your wishes are executed correctly. These case studies show the complications that may arise with an unclear will.

Marley v Rawlings [2014] UKSC 2

In January 2014, the Court of Appeal ruled that the purported mirror wills made by Mr and Mrs Rawlings were to be executed as per their wishes.

The court case began in 2006 when it was established that both Mr and Mrs Rawlings had signed the incorrect will, they had signed each other’s will, leaving both wills invalid. The mirror wills had sought to exclude the Rawlings’ own two sons and to benefit Mr Marley, who they treated as their adopted son.

Mrs Rawlings died in 2003, but it was only after Mr Rawlings died in 2006 that the mistake was noticed. The Rawlings’ two sons contested the wills and the estate was locked up in a legal battle for eight years.

The ruling has now allowed justice to prevail; the testator’s wishes can be followed. However, given that the mistake was only identified in 2006, after the death of the second spouse, and the Supreme Court ruled in 2014, this case shows the importance of following formalities to ensure that your will is valid.

The Estate of Wayland [1951] 2 All ER 1041

In 1947, a British man living in Belgium made a will in which he stated that he only wanted this will to cover his Belgium assets. In 1949, he made another will in the UK and this will used a “standard clause” which states, “I revoke all previous wills”. However, the 1949 will also specifies that it is only intended to deal with the UK assets.

So, rather than having two separate wills - one for Belgium assets made in 1947 and one for UK assets made in 1949 - when he died, he only had one will in operation, namely the UK one. It was pretty obvious that he had not intended to revoke his Belgian will, as his UK will clearly states that the will was only intended to cover his UK assets, but the use of the standard clause resulted in a lengthy dispute that could have been avoided through better wording.

In the end, it was held that the testator had no intention of revoking his previous Belgian will, the revocation clause was only to revoke his previous English will and justice won out.

We deal with foreign wills all the time and our consultants will make sure that your revocation clause is worded properly, so that you don’t end up revoking a former will by mistake.

Contact our wills team

Phone us: +44 (0) 20 7759 5531

South Africa

Cape Town

Regent Square
Doncaster Road
Kenilworth 7708 +27 (0) 21 657 2120

Durban

25 Richefond Circle
Ridgeside
Umhlanga 4320 +27 (0) 31 536 8843

United Kingdom

London

Castlewood House
77/91 New Oxford Street
WC1A 1DG +44 (0) 20 7759 7514

Croydon

5-7 Selsdon Road
South Croydon
CR2 6PU +44 (0) 20 7759 7581

Australia

Melbourne

9 Yarra Street
South Yarra
VIC 3141 +613 (0) 8651 4500

Sable International is a trading name of 1st Contact Money Limited (company number 07070528), registered in England and Wales. We are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK (FCA no. 517570), the Financial Services Conduct Authority in South Africa (1st Contact Money [PTY] Ltd - FSP no. 41900) and hold an Australian Financial Services License issued by ASIC to deal in foreign exchange (1st Contact Group - AFS License number 335 126).

We use cookies to provide the best website experience for you. Using this website means that you agree to this. How we use cookies.